Structure Ten

Structure Ten.

In 2008, the excavators uncovered “one of the largest, if not the largest, stone-built Neolithic non-funerary structures in Britain.”

Going by the name of Structure Ten, the first hint of the building came from geophysics scans, which had suggested there was something large under the turf.

Built around 2900BC, Structure Ten was the last major construction on site. Due to structural instability, it was remodelled perhaps a century later, at which point a human arm bone and carved stone ball was deposited inside.

After it was abandoned, a huge feast was held around 2450BC, when hundreds of cattle were slaughtered and consumed and some of their bones placed in the building’s surrounding passageway.

But it took excavation to reveal the sheer scale of what lay beneath.

Measuring 25 metres (82 feet) long by 19 metres (65 feet) wide, the four-metre-thick outer walls remain to a height of approximately one metre (three feet).

Its single entrance was flanked by a pair of standing stones, leading to a cruciform central chamber, combining elements of both Neolithic chambered tombs and houses, such as those at Barnhouse and Skara Brae. Structure Ten, however, was no domestic house.

Outside, a metre-wide “passage” ran between the building an an encircling stone wall.

Inside, however, despite the size of the building’s exterior, the inner, cross-shaped, chamber turned out to be comparatively small. Measuring six metres (19 feet) across, the inner chamber is a slightly larger “copy” of Maeshowe’s central chamber and was clearly not meant to hold many people at any one time.

One of the stone dressers at Skara Brae, as seen from the house’s entrance. (Sigurd Towrie)

One of the stone dressers at Skara Brae, as seen from the house entrance. (Sigurd Towrie)

The chamber contained an example of the ubiquitous stone dresser — but where these are found built against the walls at Skara Brae, for example, in Structure Ten it was free-standing and incorporated slabs of striking red and yellow sandstone, as elsewhere in the central chamber.

The craftsmanship of the exterior stonework of Structure Ten compares starkly with the scrappy central chamber stonework. This has led to the idea that Structure Ten was meant to be viewed from the outside, with access to the ‘inner sanctum’ restricted to a privileged few.

Viewed today, the remains and the sheer scale and complexity of the architecture is still an awe-inspiring sight.

It must have been spectacular in its heyday, with walls standing two metres high, and perhaps a massive roof stretching skyward. Clearly, it was meant to impress and would have been a truly incredible sight — monumental in every sense of the word.

 

Structure Ten from above. (Hugo Anderson Whymark)

Structure Ten from above. (Hugo Anderson Whymark)